Teamsters wild-cat strike in Minneapolis, In the past the term Class conflict was a term used mostly by socialists and Marxistswho define a class by its relationship to the means of production —such as factories, land and machinery. From this point of view, the social control of production and labor is a contest between classes, and the division of these resources necessarily involves conflict and inflicts harm.
In every society that was established even thousands of years before Plato, in the banks of the river Nile and even farther still in the annals of human history one can see communities divided into said categories. The former speaks of the modern capitalists, businessmen who have the means to build factories and hire laborers and the latter tells of the modern workers who are selling their skills and strength to work for their new masters.
In primitive times the division between groups of people may have been overly simplistic as separating the strong from the weak. And thus, the good hunters and gatherers did dominate over those who could not match them in physical prowess. Up to the time when he began writing, the political and social upheavals that were going on around him; these events colored the lens from which he viewed his time.
The proponent of this study would like to present a basic set of background information that can frame the premise for this idea. Karl Marx was the product of his time. He was born and raised when Europe was experiencing the radical effects of industrialization.
It was as if a new epoch was established it was no longer the time when the ancients were struggling to come up with fundamental truths Marx class struggle essay morality and philosophy.
It was no longer the time when Medieval thought dominated the entire intellectual landscape. It was now the time for the modern age. And Karl Marx saw something distinct, far more different than what was observed by those who came before him.
For Plato and Machiavelli, they have one thing in common. These two forerunners of political thought, lived in a world order where cities are very dependent on farms and the people that work in the agriculture sector. It Marx class struggle essay true that even at this early stage one can already see the class struggle between those from the city and those from the country.
But still the farmers have leverage — they live and own the land they cultivate. Moreover, in the time of Plato, the world of finance was not yet securely in place. Banks may have been in existence but it is very probable that in many parts of the world, barter and trading for goods is still the conventional way of moving around goods.
It would have been very difficult for these two philosophers to imagine that there will come a time when farmers would leave their farms and then flock into the city to do work beneath their dignity and capability. In the year when he wrote the Manifesto it is already an accepted practice in society that minted money is the new way of doing things and everything can be bought including the heart and soul of men.
Karl Marx what is more disturbing is the fact that the multitudes are willing to accept their new fate without a struggle and so together with Frederick Engels he came to make his convictions known and it was as radical as the times. Industrialization There is a reason why Karl Marx was forced to categorize society into two major groups.
The following pages will show how he came with this idea. To provide for an understanding on what made Marx speak out in horror and indignation as to the horrific effects of class struggle one can benefit from an eyewitness account of rapidly changing Europe: Large-scale factory production transformed the industrial towns into dark hives, busily puffing, clanking and screeching, smoking for twelve and fourteen hours a day, sometimes going around the clock… Men built in haste, and hardly had time to repent of their mistakes before they tore down original structures and built again, just as heedlessly.
The newcomers crowded into whatever was offered. It was a period of vast urban improvisation: The above-mentioned description of the ugly transformation of major cities in Europe was enough to paint a picture of hardship, discrimination, humiliation, and depravity.
Those who used to farm their own lands, even though they were not rich and possess gold and servants, they have a significant amount of freedom that they can use to work and to trade using the produce of their hard labor. In the industrialized cities where they have been reduced to something a little better than slaves, their ability to negotiate for rest, for a better return for their hard toil is reduced to almost zero.
Their freedom was forfeited the moment they agreed to receive wages. The money that they get on a daily or weekly cycle, allow their new master the capability to impose work schedules and production quotas that are non-negotiable.
The hardships faced by the workers are not hard to imagine. Most of them came from farms in the countryside. In areas where open spaces are free and fresh air is can be had for nothing at all.
Now they are being asked to work in an assembly line and they do not have the freedom they once enjoyed. While at the same time, their capitalist masters, without having to do the same tasks they are doing are living in palatial homes and feasting like kings.
Karl Marx had all the motivation he needed to write his masterpiece, an outburst of all the injustices made in the in the years leading to United Against Communism Aside from the fact that Karl Marx was privy to the horrible working conditions and the sad plight of the proletariat, there is another reason why he made a very sharp distinction between two classes while Plato and Machiavelli did not oversimplify the problems that plagued human societies.
There is evidence to show that all the classes belonging to the upper middle echelons of society are galvanizing together to form one single unit. This unity is achieved because they faced a common enemy — Communism. All the more, Karl Marx was convinced that the powers that be, in its fear of the unknown communist party, desperately consolidated their ranks to crush this new idea brewing first in Germany and now threatening to engulf all of Europe.
Karl Marx and company felt fenced in and could not do anything but to cry out against the move of the upper classes to mitigate this growing movement of workers desiring equality.
Thus, as predicted, society was now being polarized into two camps members of each group increasingly being alienated from the other and the more they dissociate, the more that they made it possible to see the distinction between Oppressor and the Oppressed.The year was a significant time in political history - The History of Class Struggle According to Karl Marx Essay introduction.
This was the year when Karl Marx published his Manifesto, a brilliant work on the effects of capitalism in society. Marx wanted the working class to stand up to the bourgeoisie and cause a class conflict.
Continue reading this essay Continue reading. Page 1 of 4. Next Page. More Essays: APA All papers are for research and reference purposes only!.
Class Struggle and Autonomy in the Communist Manifesto Essay - Class Struggle and Autonomy in the Communist Manifesto The University of Dayton emphasizes four humanities based themes to describe the essence of the human experience.
Karl Marx ( – ) is a German philosopher, sociologist, economist, political journalist and social activist. His work has shaped the philosophy of dialectical and historical materialism; he formed the theory of surplus value in economics, and the theory of class struggle in politics.
Marx's theory of class struggle is a logical corollary of his concept of historical materialism. The opening line of the Communist Manifesto says "The history of all . Introduction Class struggle is the active expression of a theoretical class conflict looked at from any kind of socialist perspective.
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, leading ideologists of communism, wrote "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle”.