How microeconomic mechanisms can predict future technology and economic outcomes

Judgement-based prediction[ edit ] In a non-statistical sense, the term "prediction" is often used to refer to an informed guess or opinion [3]. A prediction of this kind might be informed by a predicting person's abductive reasoninginductive reasoningdeductive reasoningand experience ; and may be of useful — if the predicting person is a knowledgeable person in the field. This type of prediction might be perceived as consistent with statistical techniques in the sense that, at minimum, the "data" being used is the predicting expert's cognitive experiences forming an intuitive "probability curve. One particular approach to such inference is known as predictive inferencebut the prediction can be undertaken within any of the several approaches to statistical inference.

How microeconomic mechanisms can predict future technology and economic outcomes

In the UK, the government is grappling with an unprecedented budget deficit and unemployment is over 1 million higher than it was before the recession. This is a crisis for the real economy and for economic policymakers, but it should also be seen as a crisis for the economics profession and for economic theory.

Not only did mainstream neoclassical economics — which has been the overwhelmingly dominant strand in economic thinking for over a century — fail to predict the collapse and recession, its models do not even concede that such events could happen.

In the future, there is bound to be more interest in economic theories that offer a better explanation of recent events; and this is where heterodox economics comes in.

Three strands of heterodox economics that are leading the way

Neoclassical Economics The failure to predict or explain the financial collapse and recession has put neoclassical economic thinking in the dock, but such an interrogation is long overdue. Sharp fluctuations in economic growth are just one of the real-world phenomena that traditional economics is poor at understanding.

From actual human behaviour through to constant innovation, there is much that traditional economic thinking struggles to explain. Get Evonomics in your inbox Neoclassical economic theories describe a world in which rational agents act as optimal decision-makers.

Guided by possession of a full set of information, self-interested agents maximise utility while firms maximise profits.

As a result, the economy is said to behave in a static and linear manner and the system tends towards a state of equilibrium: Macroeconomic patterns are simply the sum of microeconomic properties Blanchard In this model, economies are not necessarily always in equilibrium; exogenous shocks, such as the development of a new technology, can disrupt them.

But these disruptions will be temporary and market mechanisms will work to push the economy back to equilibrium. From a neoclassical perspective, economic development occurs through cyclical patterns of equilibrium, shocks, destabilisation and restabilisation.

In each cycle the content of the economy such as the goods and services it offers might change, but its very nature essentially remains the same.

This conventional model can be challenged on four fundamental fronts: In the real world, economies are not static and geared towards equilibrium; they are dynamic and in constant flux. This dynamism is endogenous; it originates within the system, not from exogenous shocks.

Consumer preferences are not formed by individuals acting solely on their own but are the result of a complex process that includes observing and interacting with other consumers. Economic agents do not have a fixed set of preferences based on rational assessment; they are subject to whims and to mimicking the behaviour of other agents.

As a result, the nature of the economic system transforms over time. In reality, the economy is a complex ecology rather than a complicated machine.

It does not respond in predictable ways. It is path-dependent, with each phase building on the previous one. A greater appreciation of this reality has led to the emergence of new schools of thought that are challenging the neoclassical world view and attempting to provide a more realistic understanding of the way economies develop and change.

This term is used to describe any innovative way of thinking about the economy, from those that represent complete breaks from the neoclassical approach to others seeking to undermine only some of its main ideas.

In this piece, three strands of heterodox economics are discussed in some detail: Each offers different insights into economic analysis by seeking a more accurate representation of the economy, and in so doing opens up new possibilities for policymakers.

This essay summarises their basic tenets — and discusses what they might mean for public policy. Complexity economics challenges fundamental orthodox assumptions and seeks to move beyond market transactions, static equilibrium analysis and homo economicus the perfectly rational, self interested individuals defined in orthodox economic models.

Brian Arthur, Steven Durlauf and David Lane suggest complexity has six defining characteristics.


Developments in the economy result from the interaction of heterogeneous agents, whose actions are determined by their environment and by the predicted actions of other agents. The absence of a global controller: The economy is characterised by competition and coordination between decision-makers and no single agent is able to exploit all opportunities in the economy.Basic forecasting methods serve to predict future events and conditions and should be key decision-making elements for management in service organizations.

Basic terminologies of time series and forecasting can be difficult to understand. There are four basic learning points: Organizations constantly try to predict economic events and. Take medical research Suppose a certain drug is Statistics papers Snapshot of statistics The Statistics Paper Series how microeconomic mechanisms can predict future technology and economic outcomes (SPS) is a channel for statisticians.

How microeconomic mechanisms can predict future technology and economic outcomes

economists and other professionals to publish innovative. Personalized medicine . Microeconomics: Making Economic Decisions - Starting A Business; the possible outcomes of each choice made in the decision-making process – are what business executives must consider to. Where once rulers relied on oracles to predict the future, today they use economists.

Virtually every elected official, every political candidate, has a favorite economist to forecast economic benefits pinned to that official's.

What does the economic future of Armenia look like? How is the future of economics? What is the future of. Equilibrium is the solution or outcome of an economic model.

How microeconomic mechanisms can predict future technology and economic outcomes

Economic models fall into two categories: Microeconomics and macroeconomics. Microeconomics is the branch of economics that studies the choices of individual households and firms.

Because it analyzes the behavior of economic units, microeconomics is a most important social science. What is an 'Econometrician ' An econometrician is an individual who uses statistics and mathematics to study, model and predict economic principles and outcomes.

How your blood may predict your future health | Inequality | The Guardian