When examining the vast literature on critical thinking, various definitions of critical thinking emerge.
Indeed, in many ways, critical thinking has become synonymous with higher education. Yet we have not found evidence that colleges or universities teach critical-thinking skills with any success.
This study has been criticized for relying too much on the CLA, but that overlooks a much more fundamental issue underscored by a growing body of research: Those of us who work in higher education have assumed that we know what critical thinking is -- how could we not?
The question remains, however, can we actually teach students that skill? The Thinking Skills Debate The debate over whether or not general thinking skills, or GTS, actually exist is well traveled within a relatively small circle of researchers and thinkers, but virtually unknown outside of it.
Given our belief in the importance of critical thinking and our assumption that students learn it, I would argue that this debate is one of the most overlooked and misunderstood issues in higher education today. As the name implies, GTS are those skills that supposedly transfer from one discipline to another.
A key question in the debate, therefore, is whether thinking skills can exist independently from discipline-specific content in a meaningful way such that transfer is possible.
Willingham, a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia; and, to a certain degree, Moore himself have defended the specifists' position. As educational researcher Stephen P.
Norris wrote in Teaching Critical Thinking: If anything, scientific evidence suggests that human mental abilities are content and context bound, and highly influenced by the complexity of the problems being addressed. In Critical Thinking and Languagehe explored how critical thinking is understood and taught by faculty from a range of disciplines at an Australian university.
While he outlined certain relations among disciplines, he found nothing to suggest that the complexity of those relations could be reduced to a core set of cognitive skills. Again, given the rising cost of education and the increasing accessibility of information, instructors and professors must move beyond being deliverers of content to remain relevant.
Yet, what to do if the research is telling us that teaching GTS is extremely difficult, if not impossible? Moving Forward If higher education is to come to terms with its promise of producing critical thinkers, it must take some specific measures.
First, no matter what they teach, professors must become much more familiar with the thinking skills debates occurring in the cognitive science, educational psychology and philosophical domains.
In fact, if institutions disseminated essential readings in this area as a sort of primer to get people started, it would be time and money well spent. With a wider appreciation of the debate, faculty members must then begin to think about thinking within the context of their own disciplines.
It does not make sense to impose some set of critical-thinking skills onto a subject area independent of the content being taught. Rather, professors of literature, science, psychology, economics and so on must reflect on how they think as scholars and researchers within their own disciplines -- and then explicitly teach those cognitive processes to students.
That metaphor leads us to look for a packaged set of thinking skills that apply with equal relevancy to virtually any situation or domain, when, while still debatable, it seems increasingly clear that no such skills exist.
Moreover, the metaphor of overlap -- like a Venn diagram -- makes the differences between sets of thinking skills as instructional as the similarities. So, as thinking skills become explicitly taught in different subjects, the student, proceeding through college, will gather overlapping investigative experiences based on his or her efforts to employ said thinking skills in various courses.
The student can then manage those overlapping experiences as a kind of portfolio that shows him or her how content is processed and problems are solved.
If a core set of thinking skills can be distilled from this portfolio, great. If not, the student still has a rich picture of how different ways of thinking overlap, even if they are always tethered to a specific domain or problem.
Ultimately, we in higher education must recognize that money is on the table. We have gambled on critical thinking, and if we are not to lose our shirts on this bet, we can no longer expect students to magically become critical thinkers.
Instead, we must move toward a pedagogy that foregrounds the explicit teaching of thinking skills. Bio John Schlueter is an instructor of English at St.Critical thinking is an asset to college students, but it' doesn't come easy.
Find out some tips HERE! Questions That Promote Deeper Thinking Surveys of college faculty reveal that their number one instructional goal is to promote critical thinking, and reports on the status of American higher education have consistently called for.
Substantive Critical Thinking as Developed by the Foundation for Critical Thinking Proves Effective in Raising SAT and ACT Test Scores Teaching Critical Thinking Skills to Fourth Grade Students Identified as Gifted and Talented.
"Critical thinking is thinking that assesses itself" (Center for Critical Thinking, b). "Critical thinking is the ability to think about one's thinking in such a way as 1. To recognize its strengths and weaknesses and, as a result, 2. "Everyone agrees that students learn in college, but whether they learn to think is more controversial." ~McKeachie, , p.
3. The discrepancy highlighted by McKeachie is at the center of ongoing debate about the role of critical thinking in our modern classrooms. A Powerful and Proven Writing Approach that Develops Critical Thinking in College-Bound Students (Write to Think- Write to Achieve Book 2) Jun 28, by Collegiate Learning.
Kindle Edition. $ $ 23 Get it TODAY, Oct 5 out of 5 stars 1.